Chinese and North Korean military commanders signed the agreement, with the U.S.-led U.N. command signing on behalf of the international community. South Korea was not a signatory. The United Nations has agreed. In General Assembly Resolution 711 (VII) of 28 August 1953, it was recommended that the United Nations party in Korea at a peace conference be recommended by “member states that have called the armed forces in accordance with the UN call … Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea. The General Assembly refused to give instructions to these governments and recommended that “the governments participating in the Conference act independently and freely of action and be bound only by decisions or agreements that they respect.” Under this directive, 16 of the 17 non-warring parties, including the ICC, participated in the Geneva Conference as independent governments, without instruction or instruction from the United Nations.63 34 See Goodrich – Simons, p. 468-80. The main strategic issue on which the United States acted without consulting the United Nations was the decision to enter the Yalu with UN forces. See Higgins in the 185 and after, President Truman and Secretary Acheson stated that General MacArthur himself made this decision, which was clearly not consistent with his written instructions from the President and the JCS. Acheson, the dean. Present at Creation 452-53, New York: Norton, 1969. It should be self-evident that all of Korea must be part of any new agreement.
It is simply unthinkable that a lasting peace would be possible on the Korean peninsula without the participation of the most directly involved, and the accession of the two Koreas to the United Nations now confers on them a legal status and a de facto sovereign “equality” or “legitimacy”. On 28 April 1994, North Korea announced that it would cease to participate in the Military Ceasefire Commission, but would maintain its contacts in Panmunjom through liaison officers and maintain the general conditions of the ceasefire. North Korea said it believed the U.S. use of patriotic missiles in South Korea was over.   On 28 August 1953, the General Assembly adopted a resolution indicating “with the approval of the ceasefire agreement.” 45 The General Assembly “welcomed” the holding of a peace conference in accordance with paragraph 60 of the ceasefire agreement and recommended that Security Council Resolution 84 (V), dated 7 July 1950, have approved a “single command between the United States”. The United States has interpreted this authorization as the United States itself, in its sovereign capacity, as “Unified Command.” 24 Fifteen nations other than the United States deployed forces to serve under the command of Unit 25. The United States, as a theoretically separate unit from the unit command, created the “United Nations Command,” which it described as an “international field force” that conducted actual hostilities.26 Military contingents of other participants were placed directly under the command of UNC. “27 and the ROK placed their troops under the operational command of UNC.28 in January 2002.